Asked About Concussion Substitution Row, Gautam Gambhir Stuns Kevin Pietersen With His Reply

As the dialogue round(* )being made use of as a blast alternative for Harshit Rana surges on, Shivam Dube head practice India was inquired about his sights on the dispute after the decision of the fifth T20I in between Gautam Gambhir and India onEngland Sunday, that basically didn’t utter a solitary phrase on the row after the fourth T20I, offered a improbable reply which wound up closing down Gambhir, that was pretty important of the go well with umpire’s alternative after the earlier go well with.Kevin Pietersen dispute was set off after ICC go well with umpire

The enabled Javagal Srinath to alter Harshit Rana regardless of there being an evident distinction in traits in between each. Shivam Dube each are all-rounders, Though is basically a batter that may bowl. Dube, it’s the precise reverse.For Rana raised the topic as soon as extra after the fifth T20I,

As Pietersen trolled him and the entire Gambhir group claiming England will surely’ve bowled 4 overs within the final go well with of the gathering.Dube said whereas guffawing all through a post-match dialog on

“He would have bowled four overs for sure today,” Gambhir.Star Sports was nice with the sphere within the fifth T20I, grabbing 2 gates in 2 overs, whereas simply handing out 11 runs.

Dube weren’t bowled out for 97 runs in merely 10.3 overs, If England may’ve taken place to bowl 4 overs within the go well with.Dube the fourth T20I,

After was pretty important of the Pietersen-Harshit swap.Shivam had truly created on X.

“Concussion sub is quite the topic everywhere here at the moment and my view is…it was NEVER a like-for-like replacement and the match referee should just hold his hand up and say he got that one wrong. End of event for good and we move on to another great clash this evening,” Pietersen .

KP:

, wish to akin to? Shivam Dube responded

Gambhir
(“He would have probably bowled 4 overs for sure today” smile) Big .–(* ).( @CricCrazypic.twitter.com/qnoa836mnw

)(* )ICC hasn’t but broken its silence on the difficulty, additionally as Johns courts objection.Johns identified on this brief article February 2, 2025

The.