RajasthanEncroachment on forest land on the premise of non...

Encroachment on forest land on the premise of non secular sentiments just isn’t allowed, superb of Rs 5 lakh imposed

-

- Advertisment -spot_img


Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court mentioned in an order that encroachment on forest land can’t be allowed on the premise of non secular sentiments. Along with this, the court docket has imposed a superb of Rs 5 lakh on Shri Shantinath Digambar Jain Atishya Kshetra, Sudarshan Tirtha. Along with this, the court docket has rejected the petition filed by the Tirtha. The court docket mentioned that out of the compensation quantity, two lakh rupees needs to be given to Shankar Lal, the one who filed the PIL within the case, and the remaining quantity needs to be deposited within the State Legal Services Authority. The division bench of Justice Pankaj Bhandari and Justice Praveer Bhatnagar gave this order whereas listening to the petition of Shri Shantinath Digambar Jain Atishya Kshetra, Sudarshan Tirtha and the PIL of Shankar Lal.

In its order, the court docket mentioned that when the hill in query doesn’t belong to the petitioner, then on what authority was the hill dug up by him. The petitioner had initially utilized to the division for allotment of this land which was recorded as a non-existent hill within the income information, which clearly exhibits that he was conscious that this was a non-existent hill. Apart from this, the petition of Shri Shantinath Digambar Jain Atishya Kshetra, Sudarshan Tirtha must also be rejected on the bottom that he didn’t disclose in his petition {that a} PIL relating to encroachment is pending within the matter.

Read: Contempt discover to officers for not following court docket order – Rajasthan High Court

A petition was filed on behalf of Shri Shantinath Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra, Sudarshan Tirtha stating that the idols of Mahavir Swami and Parshvanath have been discovered from below the bottom on the mountain in Duni, Tonk. According to Jain scriptures, it’s tons of of years previous. In such a scenario, it needs to be given to the petitioner. At the identical time, within the PIL filed by Shankar Lal, it was mentioned that this non secular place has occupied this land of the forest division. It is recorded as an inconceivable mountain within the income information. The forest division has additionally filed an FIR within the matter and has additionally imposed a penalty. After listening to all of the events, the court docket has dismissed the petition and imposed a superb of 5 lakh rupees on the petitioner.



Source link

Latest news

Thames Water missing money ‘a risk which cannot be run’, High Court knowledgeable

Allowing Thames Water to lack money by not authorizing restructuring methods is “a risk which cannot be run”,...

Grandparents’ negligence, custody of kids assigned to mom … What is the rationale?

Rajasthan High Court (File) Taking an enormous determination, the Rajasthan High...

China vacation firm offers North Korea tour from February- DW- 02/03/2025

A chinese language tour driver has precise opened up reservations for journey to a metropolis in...

Virender Sehwag “Was Almost Crying…”: BCCI Vice-President Reveals Details And What Sachin Tendulkar Did Next

. .(* )cricket group acquired to brand-new elevations underneath practice The Indian John Wright was the preliminary worldwide practice to...
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

‘Despite Rs 21 crore fee, Kareena Kapoor couldn`t afford security or a driver’

Days after Saif Ali Khan’& rsquo; s stabbing occasion drank the present enterprise, Jigra star and professional...

Heerenveen’s Robin van Persie rails at ‘unimaginable’ umpire mistake

Heerenveen employer Robin van Persie was left irritated after swimsuit authorities wrongly enabled Fortuna Sittard to space 12...

Must read

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you