Camera Champions Face Off: iPhone 16 Pro vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra

0
4
Camera Champions Face Off: iPhone 16 Pro vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra


When you’re looking for the best cam to usher in your pocket, you require to consider at present’s top-tier telephones. The imaging skills of the iPhone 16 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra are amongst the best money can get. And with touring interval improve, carry a telephone is likely to be one of the crucial sensible cam. But for image data precisely how do these 2 cellular titans distinction?

To study, I fired quite a few photos making use of each telephones in a variety of issues to see which telephone takes the best-looking images. What’s “best” is often to particular person standpoint so whereas I’ll offer my particular person tackle every examination as an knowledgeable digital photographer and providing my causes I favor one over the assorted different, you would possibly properly find that you just favor the assorted different. So look by way of the number of situations under and see should you contain a varied remaining thought.

Read far more: Best Camera Phone of 2025

All images revealed have truly been taken making use of every telephone’s default cam setting making use of default setups, except or else specified. While images from the Galaxy S25 have truly been posted as taken, the iPhone’s images have truly wanted to be remodeled by way of Adobe Lightroom as our posting system doesn’t maintain Apple’s default HEIF image format. This process doesn’t influence the image by any means.

Ready? Let’s dive in.

Image of a pathway next to a river

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a pathway next to a river

Galaxy S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

Starting out with an easy exterior scene. Both telephones have truly accomplished a superb process catching an additionally direct publicity under and each images are loaded with data. It’s difficult to select in between them, nonetheless the iPhone has the facet for me because it’s completed a considerably hotter image with much more natural-looking tones. The S25 Ultra’s image appears as properly saturated, particularly in heaven skies, which I find pretty disruptive.

Image of a pathway next to a river

iPhone 16 Pro, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a pathway next to a river

Galaxy S25 Ultra, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/

It’s related story after we change to the ultrawide lenses on each telephones. I favor the hotter tones within the iPhone’s shot, that makes the S25 Ultra’s look pretty chilly comparative. I likewise favor the lighter darkness on the iPhone’s image, making it an easy win for the iPhone under. Notably, each telephones are doing a superb process of constructing up for the ultrawide lenses on the sides (a characteristic activated by default on each telephones); the barrier continues to be straight in every shot and never bending as you ‘d usually see making use of a lens this broad.

Image of blossom

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
blossom-s25-ultra

Galaxy S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

There’s virtually no distinction in between these 2 exterior scenes. The bloom appears crisp on each images, with excellent basic direct publicity. The iPhone’s image is as soon as once more just a little hotter in tone nonetheless it’s minimal.

Image of bluebells in green grass

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of bluebells in green grass

Galaxy S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

The Galaxy S25 takes an easy win with this photograph of bluebells. The shades are much more energetic, particularly within the eco-friendlies on the blades of turf, which look pretty rinsed on the iPhone’s image. It actually resembles the S25’s cam lens is just a little polarized to lower representations and enhance saturation, nonetheless I don’t perceive if that holds true. Either means, Samsung takes the win under.

Image of bluebells

iPhone 16 Pro, 5x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of bluebells

Galaxy S25 Ultra, 5x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/

At 5x zoom factors worsen for the iPhone Despite the bluebells being pretty away, the telephone appeared incapable to perform a pointy focus on the blossoms. The S25 Ultra, alternatively, dealt with to perform a pointy image with richer shades.

Image of a road with cars and buildings

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a road with cars and buildings

Galaxy S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

I favor the iPhone’s image under although. It’s brighter and the hotter shades on the blocks on the encompassing buildings look much more practical.

Zoomed in image of a tower block

iPhone 16 Pro, 5x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/
Zoomed in image of a tower block

Galaxy S25 Ultra, 5x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/

The iPhone’s image is as soon as once more brighter under and I favor its shades as properly. The Galaxy S25 Ultra does have the facet in nice data, nonetheless. You truly require to focus to see it nonetheless the little strains on the construction are just a little sharper on the S25.

Zoomed in image of a tower block

Galaxy S25 Ultra, 10x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/

The S25 Ultra does have a bodily profit over the iPhone with its 10x optical zoom lens, which permits it to focus additionally higher whereas nonetheless maintaining a pin-sharp image.

Close up image of a pigeon

iPhone 16 Pro, 10x digital zoom

Andrew Lanxon/
Close up image of a pigeon

Galaxy S25 Ultra, 10x optical zoom.

Andrew Lanxon/

You can nonetheless electronically focus with the iPhone to 10x, and the outcomes aren’t poor. I favor the shades of the S25 Ultra’s shot under, nonetheless the excellence completely isn’t that recognizable.

Two close up images of a pigeon

Close plant of iPhone 16 Pro (left) and S25 Ultra (rigiht)

Andrew Lanxon/

Zooming in close to to see the nice data, the S25 Ultra’s optical zoom image most positively has just a little bit far more clearness nonetheless the digital upscaling on the iPhone’s shot has truly accomplished a superb process under, as the excellence isn’t large.

iPhone 16 Pro vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra: Night settings contrasted

Two images of a spire and streetlights

iPhone 16 Pro (left), Galaxy S25 Ultra (proper), each at 5x zoom

Andrew Lanxon/

At initially glimpse, the one precise distinction in between the iPhone’s 5x shot and the S25 Ultra’s 5x shot is the shade equilibrium. And honestly, I wouldn’t have a alternative in between the hotter tone of the iPhone or the much more magenta prejudice of the S25.

Cropped image comparing two street lights

Detail plant on iPhone (left) and S25 Ultra (proper)

Andrew Lanxon/

However, once you focus close to to the knowledge, the iPhone has truly created a sharper image under, with an odd sort of digital obscuring across the gentle message within the S25 Ultra’s image. So in some instances the S25 Ultra’s zoom is sharper, varied different occasions it’s the iPhone’s. I’m glad they’re making this easy for me.

Night time image of a river with buildings

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Night time image of a river with buildings

S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

Again, the one precise distinction under stays within the shade equilibrium and I don’t truly perceive which I favor. The direct publicity, sound levels and amount of knowledge are nearly the identical.

Wide angle image of a river at night

iPhone 16 Pro, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/
Wide angle image of a river at night

Galaxy S25 Ultra, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/

Things altered after I modified to the ultrawide lenses, nonetheless. The S25 Ultra’s shot is most positively brighter, catching much more data within the rocks within the foreground and within the buildings distant. The iPhone’s image is way darker basic.

Image of a tent and frozen doorway

iPhone 16 Pro, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a tent and frozen doorway

Galaxy S25 Ultra, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/

Just to perplex factors much more, the iPhone’s nighttime image with its ultrawide lens is considerably brighter than the S25 Ultra’s on this occasion that I fired in theArctic I actually wanted to establish the image metadata to make sure I had not mixed these up, nonetheless I’ve not. The iPhone’s image has truly caught far more gentle data under and created much more data on the ice door to the correct.

Image of an old pub at night

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of an old pub at night

S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

The iPhone’s nighttime image is as soon as once more just a little brighter under nonetheless it’s likewise maintained the good highlights on the membership indication managed. On the S25 Ultra’s image, these highlights are virtually shed to pure white nonetheless the great eco-friendly and yellow tones have truly been maintained within the iPhone’s image. The shades usually are considerably hotter on the iPhone’s shot, nonetheless, which could not be to your desire. Here, I imagine they operate properly.

Image of a boat at night

iPhone 16 Pro, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a boat at night

S25 Ultra, main cam

Andrew Lanxon/

But on this occasion, the iPhone has truly created a unusually warm-looking image that I truly don’t resembling. Those cozy shades had been absent on the time of seize and it doesn’t assist the scene, particularly not with such stable orange tones overhead. The S25 Ultra’s image is much more properly balanced basic and it’s a considerably sharper image as properly. It’s an very simple win for Samsung under.

Image of a boat at night

iPhone 16 Pro, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/
Image of a boat at night

S25 Ultra, ultrawide lens

Andrew Lanxon/

Things don’t improve for the iPhone when making use of the ultra-wide lens. Its image is as soon as once more pestered by extraordinarily cozy tones, whereas the S25 Ultra’s shot is each far more color-accurate and brighter.

iPhone 16 Pro vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra: Which takes significantly better selfies?

Picture of a handsome man in a hat

iPhone 16 Pro, selfie cam

Andrew Lanxon/
Picture of a handsome man in a hat

S25 Ultra, selfie cam

Andrew Lanxon/

While the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s selfie is just a little brighter, I don’t like what it’s completed with the shades. My face has truly been made an uncommon shade of orange and my denim coat is a a lot deeper blue than it truly is. The complexion on the iPhone’s shot are much more precise, and its shot is sharper too.

Picture of a handsome man in a hat

iPhone 16 Pro, selfie cam in broad setting

Andrew Lanxon/
Picture of a handsome man in a hat

S25 Ultra, selfie cam in broad setting

Andrew Lanxon/

Both telephones have a wider-angle setting for the selfie cam, though the iPhone’s seems to be an entire lot greater. That’s most positively price allowing for should you typically resembling to pack nice offers of fine buddies proper into your workforce photos. You would possibly most probably press on the very least a few extra good buddies in should you utilized the iPhone, or want to decide on that you just just like the very least and depart them out of construction should you utilized the S25Ultra Otherwise, the image distinctions coincide as beforehand.

iPhone 16 Pro Vs Galaxy S25 Ultra: Which cam is significantly better?

I’ve created numerous these distinction gadgets on completely different generations of telephones in my 14 years at and I don’t keep in mind having truly accomplished one which’s felt this shut. The bother is that neither telephone excels repeatedly in a single location; the iPhone 16 Pro’s ultra-wide pictures aren’t as good because the S25 Ultra’s, apart from on these occasions when they are surely, confusingly. I’ve taken much more images not consisted of under that each help just a few of my verdicts and recommend versus them. Go quantity.

But there are some takeaways I can provide self-confidence. Generally speaking, the iPhone’s shades are far more all-natural than the S25 Ultra’s, which might in some instances look extraordinarily saturated. This has truly held true with virtually each Samsung telephone contemplating that the agency started inserting video cameras in them and it’s nonetheless the occasion at present. Those looking for an additional all-natural base image to make use of your very personal filters and impacts over will definitely be significantly better matched with the iPhone 16 Pro.

But that’s a lot much less the occasion within the night, when the iPhone far more repeatedly provides hotter tones that look a lot much less all-natural than the S25Ultra’s So, if night digital pictures is essential to you, the S25 Ultra is likely to be the significantly better different. Overall, its night setting images from all lenses had been brighter and sharper.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
James Martin/

Sure, the S25 Ultra has the extended zoom selection nonetheless you ‘d actually require to understand you’ll make the most of a 10x zoom to validate deciding on one over the assorted different. Personally, I find the 5x zoom diploma a superb nice space and under the telephones are virtually on the identical degree. And on these unusual occasions you would possibly want to press factors much more, the iPhone’s digital zoom can nonetheless provide sharp outcomes.

There are varied different factors for digital photographers to consider as properly: Apple’s Pro Raw is improbable and whereas the agency’s Photographic Styles may be useful for together with an revolutionary purpose to your images, Samsung’s brand-new gadget for simulating the shade high quality from occasion photos you feed it features remarkably properly– I actually imagine I may acquire much more utilization out of that basic. I’ve not additionally entered into video clip fine quality both, which is a complete varied different publish, particularly once you consider each telephones shoot Log video clip, though simply the iPhone makes use of Pro Res.

Deciding in between the telephones primarily based solely on the video cameras is nigh on tough. Which one you must acquire will definitely reasonably boil all the way down to the bigger inquiry of iphone versus Android; which system you’re at the moment making use of and which one will definitely operate finest with varied different gadgets of know-how in your life. But for simple picture fine quality, you would possibly too throw a coin.



Source link